 |
|
| 2.953 and Mozilla - "cannot execute binary" |
|
|
By SD - Posted on January 3, 2005 - 19:24:42 (#15264)
Current version when comment was posted: 3.4.3 |
|
|
Something weird happens if i use gcc 2.953 to build mozilla uner R5 (netserver).
I set specs as symlink to specs.r5, but id didn't help.
So, what happens:
after successfull building of Mozilla under netserver, it is impossible to launch resulted binary at that R5 where it was built. Attempt results in weird message in shell - "cannot execute binary".
But much more weird is fact that same binary starts without problem when i booted R5+bone7a BeOS.
Any guess?
|
|
| GCC 3.4.3 release update |
|
|
By ahwayakchih - Posted on December 27, 2004 - 18:22:24 (#15187)
Current version when comment was posted: 3.4.3 |
|
|
On 2004-12-26 around 21:50:00 GMT i've updated zip file on server. Sorry everyone who downloaded file before that. Still it's not required to re-download it because changes were very small (and You may apply them by Yourself :)
Removed 3 header files from gnupro-3.4.3/i586-pc-beos/include/i586-pc-beos/be/:
- interface/InterfaceDefs.h
- support/Beep.h
- support/UTF8.h
and commented out two functions in gnupro-3.4.3/i586-pc-beos/include/i586-pc-beos/be/interface/GraphicDefs.h:
- bool bitmaps_support_space()
- status_t get_pixel_size_for()
All that to keep user from accidentally use them (ABI incompatibilities).
|
|
| building network related code on 5.0.3 |
|
|
By mmadia - Posted on December 27, 2004 - 18:11:18 (#15186)
Current version when comment was posted: 3.4.3 |
|
|
i'm adding this here in case other people have issues building network related code on 5.0.3
quoted from
http://www.livejournal.com/community/bezilla/67073.html
entry by fyysik:
By default, in new gcc 2.953 file /boot/develop/tools/gcc-2.95.3_binutils-2.15/lib/gcc-lib/i586-pc-beos/2.95.3-beos-041202/specs
is symlink to specs.Default, which lacks -lnet entry.
So, in order to build Mozilla/Firefox successfully under netserver, you should relink it to specs.R5 in same folder.
Thanks to Marcin Konicki aka ahwayakchih aka ex-Shard for that tip!
|
|
| Thanks! |
|
|
By gmiranda - Posted on December 26, 2004 - 00:28:20 (#15172)
Current version when comment was posted: 3.4.3 |
|
|
Thanks for giving us an updated compiler!
|
|
| Simply wonderful! |
|
|
By BryanV - Posted on December 17, 2004 - 17:03:48 (#15078)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.95.3-beos-041202 |
|
|
Best gcc for BeOS I've ever used. Hands down.
Great work Oliver, this should be standard issue for anyone using R5. Much more stable, loads more reliable.
|
|
| re: Patches |
|
|
By Oliver Tappe - Posted on December 12, 2004 - 13:16:01 (#15030)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.95.3-beos-041202 |
|
|
Hi Peter,
good to know that gcc-2.95.3 works on Zeta Neo, too.
The two patches-archives that are included in the package (patches-binutils.zip and patches-gcc.zip) are there only in case someone wants to recompile binutils and/or gcc. These patches are the ones that are needed to get from the CVS-versions (at gcc.gnu.org) to the respective BeOS-versions.
It would of course be best to get these patches (esp. binutils) committed into the fsf-CVS tree, but that won't happen, as some of the patches are changing central pieces of code in a system-specific manner (in order to fix BeOS-"peculiarities"), which the binutils-maintainer isn't prepared to accept (and rightly so).
Ahwayakchih (who has done a port of gcc-3.4) and me are currently working together to find a set of improved patches that we might get into the fsf-CVS.
cheers,
Oliver
|
|
| patches |
|
|
By moooooooo - Posted on December 12, 2004 - 12:18:37 (#15028)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.95.3-beos-041202 |
|
|
Thanks for this. I'm using it on Zeta Neo and your instructions are fine.
One question:
do i need to apply the patches?
cheers
peter
|
|
| O3 |
|
|
By SD - Posted on December 5, 2004 - 12:54:47 (#14960)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.95.3-beos-041202 |
|
|
Recently built full Mozilla Suite with this version and O3 optimization flags. Seems working nice so far (with 2.9 even O2 led to bugs).
|
|
| My fault |
|
|
By tqh - Posted on December 4, 2004 - 17:46:36 (#14954)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.95.3-beos-041202 |
|
|
libstdc++.r4.so did not copy correctly.
|
|
| Hmm |
|
|
By tqh - Posted on December 4, 2004 - 15:33:46 (#14952)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.95.3-beos-041202 |
|
|
Is it just me or is there something different with this one.
I've used the older versions, but after recompiling OpenTracker with this one I get 'Missing library'. This is on BONE.
|
|
| Thanks! |
|
|
By BiPolar - Posted on November 13, 2004 - 10:34:42 (#14719)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.95.3-beos-041111 |
|
|
|
| re: Great work |
|
|
By Oliver Tappe - Posted on November 11, 2004 - 16:14:50 (#14707)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.95.3-beos-041111 |
|
|
Thanks Jack!
> Should I also change the cpp headers in my beos installation
> with the ones included, then?
Yes, by all means do it, as the new headers contain many bugfixes, esp. a threadsafe std::string allocator.
Furthermore, they add more standard-classes (sstream and valarray for instance).
cheers,
Oliver
|
|
| Great work |
|
|
By Jack Burton - Posted on November 11, 2004 - 14:46:23 (#14706)
Current version when comment was posted: 2.95.3-beos-041111 |
|
|
I've been hoping for a fixed compiler for ages, since not any single other version we had was really good, for a reason or another. You've made a great service to the beos community :)
Now downloading...
P.S: Should I also change the cpp headers in my beos installation with the ones included, then ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comment Pages:
<< prev | 1 | 2 | next >> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
| |
Recent Downloads - # 85
Total Downloads - # 484
Total Views - # 205
User Ratings - N/A
|
|
|
|
 |
| |
Dev. Languages
|
|
|
|
 |
|
1. BePodder - 9.80
2. QEMU - 9.68
3. ScummVM - 9.57
4. cpu_fix - 9.42
5. Jukebox - 9.40
6. libdl.so - 9.40
7. Haiku AGP busm... - 9.35
8. vim6 - 9.31
9. Beezer - 9.26
10. HandBrake - 9.25
|
|
|
|
 |
|
1. BeOS 5 Perso... - 13,545
2. Realtek RTL8... - 13,087
3. Ati Radeon G... - 12,523
4. Ensoniq Audio... - 7,533
5. ATI Rage 128... - 7,429
6. USB Joystick... - 5,635
7. Broadcom 440x... - 5,397
8. S3 Trio 64 v2... - 4,701
9. USB Serial dr... - 4,700
10. Intel Extreme... - 4,459
|
|
|
|
 |
| You are not logged in.
Login
|
|
|
|
 |
|
